Mendelian Inheritance (Dominance, Segregation, Independent Assortment)

Segregation and independent assortment as distinct laws — predict offspring genotype and phenotype ratios from first principles.

  • Confuses the law of segregation with the law of independent assortment
  • Conflates allele dominance with allele frequency

Punnett Squares and Probability of Inheritance

Probability rules drive inheritance math — product and sum rules, test crosses, and the assumptions hiding behind 9:3:3:1.

  • Treats Mendelian ratios as deterministic counts rather than probabilities
  • Applies the 9:3:3:1 ratio without verifying independent assortment

Pedigree Analysis and Modes of Inheritance

Read family trees to distinguish autosomal from X-linked, dominant from recessive, and pinpoint obligate carriers.

  • Attributes male-predominant recessive traits to autosomal rather than X-linked inheritance
  • Confuses obligate carriers (logically certain) with possible carriers (probabilistic)

Non-Mendelian Inheritance (Codominance, Incomplete, X-Linked, Mitochondrial)

Codominance, incomplete dominance, mitochondrial inheritance, and imprinting each break a different Mendelian rule.

  • Conflates codominance with incomplete dominance by assuming both produce blended phenotypes
  • Assumes females are always unaffected carriers for X-linked recessive traits

Genetic Linkage and Recombination Frequency

Physical proximity on a chromosome ties alleles together and distorts independent assortment — recombination frequency measures how much.

  • Assumes recombination frequency increases without limit as genes get farther apart
  • Treats genetic linkage as absolute rather than probabilistic

Chromosomal Disorders (Aneuploidy, Translocations)

Nondisjunction timing determines which aneuploid gametes form; karyotype patterns distinguish Down, Turner, and Klinefelter syndromes.

  • Conflates the clinical presentations of Klinefelter and Turner syndromes
  • Fails to distinguish the gamete outcomes of meiosis I vs meiosis II nondisjunction

Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

Five strict assumptions define equilibrium — violate any one and allele frequencies shift; p² + 2pq + q² = 1 connects genotype to disease incidence.

  • Confuses the recessive allele frequency (q) with the carrier genotype frequency (2pq)
  • Sets disease incidence equal to q rather than q²

Natural Selection (Directional, Stabilizing, Disruptive)

Directional, stabilizing, and disruptive selection produce distinct phenotype distribution shifts; fitness means reproductive output, nothing else.

  • Confuses stabilizing selection (narrows variance) with directional selection (shifts mean)
  • Equates biological fitness with physical strength rather than reproductive success
See how your Anki deck covers these topics.Upload for a free audit →

Genetic Drift, Bottleneck, Founder Effect, Gene Flow

Random allele frequency change dominates small populations; bottleneck and founder effects reduce diversity through distinct mechanisms.

  • Incorrectly attributes a beneficial direction to genetic drift
  • Treats bottleneck and founder effects as identical rather than mechanistically distinct

Speciation and Reproductive Isolation

Reproductive isolation — pre- or postzygotic — defines species boundaries whether geographic separation is involved or not.

  • Assumes allopatric speciation requires a permanent rather than temporary geographic barrier
  • Misclassifies hybrid inviability and sterility as prezygotic rather than postzygotic isolation

Evidence for Evolution (Fossil, Molecular, Comparative Anatomy)

Homologous versus analogous structures, molecular clocks, and phylogenetic tree node-reading all appear as discrete interpretation questions.

  • Confuses analogous structures (convergent evolution) with homologous structures (common descent)
  • Confuses molecular clock (neutral DNA divergence rate) with morphological rate of evolution

See how your Anki deck covers Heredity and Genetic Variation.

Upload your deck for a free audit →