At a glance

AnKing v12Mnemosyne
High-yield coreComprehensiveComprehensive
BreadthComprehensiveComprehensive
DepthDeep ~36 cards/conceptModerate ~16 cards/concept
Step 1 cards~33k~15k
Best forOne complete primary deckBroad coverage, mid-volume

Quality axes are shapes, not exact figures — the card-to-concept mapping is probabilistic. Depth is study style (cards per concept), not a quality score. How we audit decks →

How they differ

Both decks cover essentially the same Step 1 concepts — heavy overlap is the norm. The differences that actually matter:

Coverage differences are reported at the area level — our card-to-concept mapping is reliable in aggregate but not precise enough to name individual missing topics.

Which fits you

Pick AnKing v12 if you want one complete primary deck; pick Mnemosyne if you want broad coverage, mid-volume. Either way, the only thing that moves your score is what you've actually reviewed — not which deck ships a few more cards. Full AnKing v12 audit · Full Mnemosyne audit

Frequently asked questions

Is AnKing v12 or Mnemosyne better for Step 1?

Neither is strictly better — they overlap heavily because both cover the same Step 1 content. AnKing v12 is one complete primary deck; Mnemosyne is broad coverage, mid-volume. The practical difference is depth and volume — how many cards each spends per concept — not which concepts are covered. Pick the one that fits how you study.

Can I use AnKing v12 and Mnemosyne together?

You can, but because they overlap so heavily, running both is mostly redundant — you'd review the same concepts twice. Most students pick one as their primary deck. The reason to choose one over the other is its depth, volume, and style, not chasing missing content.

Whichever you pick — see what you've actually retained, not just what the deck covers.

Audit my deck — free →