Have this deck? See what you've actually reviewed — not just what it covers.See my real coverage →

Coverage by area

AreaCoverageDepth
BiochemistrycomprehensiveDeep
ImmunologycomprehensiveDeep
MicrobiologycomprehensiveDeep
General PathologycomprehensiveDeep
General PharmacologycomprehensiveDeep
CardiovascularcomprehensiveDeep
EndocrinecomprehensiveDeep
GastrointestinalcomprehensiveDeep
Hematology and OncologycomprehensiveDeep
Musculoskeletal, Skin, and Connective TissuecomprehensiveDeep
Neurology and Special SensescomprehensiveDeep
PsychiatrycomprehensiveModerate
RenalcomprehensiveDeep
ReproductivecomprehensiveDeep
RespiratorycomprehensiveDeep
Public Health SciencescomprehensiveModerate
TotalComprehensive breadthDeep · ~36 cards/concept

Two different axes. Coverage is how much of the area the deck touches (comprehensive / solid / lightly covered). Depth is how hard it drills what it covers — cards per concept, a study-style signal, not a quality score. A small area can be fully covered yet lightly drilled, so the two columns move independently. Shapes rather than precise figures — the mapping is probabilistic.

Coming from another deck?

Most Step 1 decks overlap heavily — they cover the same exam — so switching rarely changes which concepts you see. What actually differs is how hard each deck drills a concept (depth) and, occasionally, how much ground it covers (area level). Both, per deck:

If you've usedHow AnKing v12 compares
vs Soze Step 1Drills deeper ~36 vs ~5 cards/concept
+ covers Public Health Sciences, Respiratory more fully
vs MnemosyneDrills deeper ~36 vs ~16 cards/concept
vs LightyearDrills deeper ~36 vs ~16 cards/concept
vs ZankiDrills deeper ~36 vs ~22 cards/concept

Depth is cards per concept (study style, not quality); coverage differences are reported at the area level — the card-to-concept mapping is reliable in aggregate but not precise enough to call out individual missing topics. Compare any two Step 1 decks →

Coverage by official USMLE system

The same coverage, re-grouped against the official NBME content outline (organ systems) rather than our study-resource areas. Every subtopic is mapped to its NBME system.

NBME systemCoverage
Multisystem (foundational)comprehensive
Cardiovascularcomprehensive
Immunecomprehensive
Respiratorycomprehensive
Gastrointestinalcomprehensive
Female Repro & Breastcomprehensive
Nervous & Special Sensescomprehensive
Pregnancy & Childbirthcomprehensive
Blood & Lymphoreticularcomprehensive
Endocrinecomprehensive
Musculoskeletalcomprehensive
Renal & Urinarycomprehensive
Skin & Subcutaneouscomprehensive
Behavioral Healthcomprehensive
Male Reprocomprehensive
Social Sciencescomprehensive
Biostatistics & Epidemiologycomprehensive

Omitted (too few mapped subtopics to characterize): Human Development.

Compare all Step 1 decks by system →

Where AnKing v12 runs lighter

Concepts our outline flags as lightly covered here — ranked by how heavily Step 1 tests them, so what's worth supplementing sits at the top. Lighter coverage isn't a defect; a focused deck deliberately spends its cards elsewhere.

Your deck covers a lot — but how much have you actually retained?Audit my reviewed cards →

AnKing's #HighYield tagging

AnKing classifies every reviewed card into one of five yield levels. Here's how the 27,498 Step 1 cards in the deck break down.

~12,900#HighYield cards (L1 + L2)
~7,100strict 1-HighYield only
~14,600not in #HighYield (L3, L4, L5, or untagged)
TagCardsShareSubtopics covered
1-HighYield7,12226.0%805/915 (88%)
2-RelativelyHighYield5,75321.0%815/915 (89%)
3-HighYield-temporary3,12011.0%729/915 (80%)
4-LowerYield2,82210.0%757/915 (83%)
5-LowYield1,9487.0%499/915 (55%)
Untagged6,73324.0%808/915 (88%)

About 24.0% of cards are untagged — AnKing's yield system is applied to most but not all of the deck. "Untagged" doesn't mean low priority.

Where AnKing's #HighYield concentrates

Subtopics with the most cards tagged 1-HighYield or 2-RelativelyHighYield.

Subtopics with cards in the deck but no #HighYield-tagged cards

Topics covered in AnKing where none of the cards carry a 1-HighYield or 2-RelativelyHighYield tag. Filtering to #HighYield skips these.

What AnKing v12 users lapse on most

Subtopics with the highest median lapse rate across Step 1 students who uploaded their decks to Lacunos. These are the cards the cohort keeps forgetting — likely worth extra drilling whatever deck you use.

That's the cohort. Your lapses cluster differently — find where →

How to pair AnKing v12 with other resources

Most students pair the AnKing Step 1 deck with First Aid as a reading anchor — AnKing's cards are largely tagged to First Aid chapters, so the two resources reinforce each other directly. Pathoma is the standard complement for General Pathology and organ-system pathology depth; even though AnKing covers General Pathology strongly, Pathoma's video explanations build the conceptual scaffolding that makes the cards stick faster. Sketchy covers Microbiology and Pharmacology through visual mnemonics, and because AnKing already runs deep in both of those areas, Sketchy functions as a memorization accelerant rather than a content supplement — many students use Sketchy-based Anki cards integrated into the AnKing deck itself via AnkiHub.

For the areas where AnKing runs lighter, targeted resources make a real difference. Boards & Beyond is the go-to supplement for Evidence-Based Medicine and Social Determinants of Health — two Public Health Sciences topics where AnKing's coverage is thinner and B&B's structured video lectures fill the content efficiently. For the lighter cardiovascular and psychiatry topics — NSTEMI Risk Stratification and Timing, Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy, Schizophreniform Disorder, and Illness Anxiety Disorder — a focused read of the relevant First Aid sections or UWorld question explanations is usually sufficient to close the gap. The lighter musculoskeletal entries like Fracture Healing Stages and Costochondritis are best handled through UWorld exposure rather than building out a parallel card set.

Frequently asked questions

Is AnKing enough for Step 1?

Yes — the AnKing Step 1 deck covers the high-yield core of USMLE Step 1 comprehensively, with broad and deep coverage across every major system. It runs lighter on a handful of topics, most notably Social Determinants of Health, Evidence-Based Medicine, and a few cardiovascular and psychiatry subtopics, which are easy to supplement with Boards & Beyond or First Aid. For the vast majority of students, AnKing is their single primary deck from day one of dedicated prep through exam day.

How many cards are in AnKing?

The AnKing Step 1 deck contains approximately 33,000 cards, making it one of the largest and most comprehensive Anki decks available for USMLE Step 1 preparation. Most students do not attempt every card — they suspend cards outside their current study block and unsuspend as they go, following a system like AnKing's own recommended order. The ~33k figure reflects the full deck before any personal filtering.

Where does AnKing run lighter for Step 1?

AnKing runs lightest on Social Determinants of Health and Evidence-Based Medicine within the Public Health Sciences domain — these are the highest-priority areas to supplement, since they carry real exam weight. It also covers NSTEMI Risk Stratification and Timing, Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy, β-Blocker and Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose, Schizophreniform Disorder, Illness Anxiety Disorder, Fracture Healing Stages, Minoxidil, and Costochondritis more lightly than its strongest areas. A targeted read of First Aid or Boards & Beyond for those topics is usually all it takes.

What is AnKing's strongest subject area for Step 1?

AnKing covers Biochemistry, Immunology, Microbiology, General Pathology, and General Pharmacology most fully — these are the areas where the deck is both comprehensive in breadth and deep in card density. That depth is a deliberate design choice: the deck spends many cards per concept in these high-yield domains, building the kind of durable recall that translates directly to Step 1 performance. Students who are strong in these subjects after AnKing review typically report the highest confidence gains heading into dedicated prep.

This page shows what the deck covers. Upload yours to see what you've actually reviewed.

Your coverage map — sample

Cardiovascularwell covered
Microbiologysolid
Renalthin
Reproductiveblind spot

Illustrative — your report is built from your own review history.

One free upload: a coverage map of your reviews across the full Step 1 outline, the concepts slipping from memory right now, and how you compare with other Step 1 students.

Audit my deck — free →

Free · ~2 min · works with any deck · no account needed