At a glance

ZankiMnemosyne
High-yield coreStrongComprehensive
BreadthBroadComprehensive
DepthModerate ~22 cards/conceptModerate ~16 cards/concept
Step 1 cards~18k~15k
Best forClassic full coverageBroad coverage, mid-volume

Quality axes are shapes, not exact figures — the card-to-concept mapping is probabilistic. Depth is study style (cards per concept), not a quality score. How we audit decks →

How they differ

Both decks cover essentially the same Step 1 concepts — heavy overlap is the norm. The differences that actually matter:

Coverage differences are reported at the area level — our card-to-concept mapping is reliable in aggregate but not precise enough to name individual missing topics.

Which fits you

Pick Zanki if you want classic full coverage; pick Mnemosyne if you want broad coverage, mid-volume. Either way, the only thing that moves your score is what you've actually reviewed — not which deck ships a few more cards. Full Zanki audit · Full Mnemosyne audit

Frequently asked questions

Is Zanki or Mnemosyne better for Step 1?

Neither is strictly better — they overlap heavily because both cover the same Step 1 content. Zanki is classic full coverage; Mnemosyne is broad coverage, mid-volume. The practical difference is depth and volume — how many cards each spends per concept — not which concepts are covered. Pick the one that fits how you study.

Can I use Zanki and Mnemosyne together?

You can, but because they overlap so heavily, running both is mostly redundant — you'd review the same concepts twice. Most students pick one as their primary deck. The reason to choose one over the other is its depth, volume, and style, not chasing missing content.

Whichever you pick — see what you've actually retained, not just what the deck covers.

Audit my deck — free →